RE: [election-services] GAO VVSG response item #1

[Bernard Van Acker <bernard_vanacker@be.ibm.com>]

David,

A remark concerning the text below, and in particular the words "which are
royalty free and provide open public license terms".
- are you sure this requirement should be made in the context of a
standards body?
- can we exclude with 100% certainty that in a particular situation a
privately licensed code or a good patented concept provides more value for
money, for example by being cheaper?

If there are some doubts, I would rather suggest deleting these words, and
focus on our main area, i.e. standardisation.

Any objections?

Regards,

Bernard

Bernard Van Acker
IT Architect
IBM Global Services
tel ++32 2 225 2939 mobile ++32 496 84 62 60
e-mail: Bernard_Vanacker@be.ibm.com



                                                                           
             "Borras, John"                                                
             <John.Borras@legs                                             
             b.gov.uk>                                                  To 
                                       "David Webber \(XML\)"              
             12/07/2005 10:34          <david@drrw.info>                   
                                                                        cc 
                                       <election-services@lists.oasis-open 
                                       .org>                               
                                                                   Subject 
                                       RE: [election-services] GAO VVSG    
                                       response item #1                    
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Happy with the tweaks.  The ball is back with you, let me know when you
want further input.
John

-----Original Message-----
From: David Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: 11 July 2005 21:11
To: Borras, John; Paul Spencer
Cc: election-services@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [election-services] GAO VVSG response item #1


John,

Still needs few more tweaks here - to make sure associated parts remain
together - little disjointed as it was - amended copy below.

Also - I'm intending that we can send this to GAO as part of their request
for comment on their VVSG1 - but there is more to be done on that front, so
this piece should become part of that overall submission.  I'll work up
some
thoughts on a possible outline structure for a response that introduces EML
to the GAO, and then suggests where their VVSG1 has opportunities to
leverage EML.  We can then see who would like to spend their summer
holidays
typing some of that for us!

DW

<vote_process_terms>
 Digital vote records, audit trail control and vote process configuration
 and control scripts should be implemented, stored and prepared using
 open public specifications which are royalty free and provide open
 public license terms.  The configuration, rendering and transfer of
 such records and voting content should use formats that utilize
 content mark-up language techniques such as the widely adopted
 Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) syntax along with content
 formats such as those specified by the OASIS Election
 Mark-up Language (EML) standard.  The process definitions
 and implementations can then be independently verified and
 compatibility certified.
</vote_process_terms>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Borras, John" <John.Borras@legsb.gov.uk>
To: "David Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>; "Paul Spencer"
<paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>
Cc: <election-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:13 AM
Subject: RE: [election-services] GAO VVSG response item #1


I'm not an English major but.....

Here's my take which avoids repetition about open public specs and brings
the royalty free but up front - v important.  Any final comments?

<vote_process_terms>
 Digital vote records, audit trail control and vote process configuration
and control scripts should be implemented, stored and prepared using open
public specifications, which are royalty free and provide open public
 license terms, and process definitions that can be independently verified
 and with which compatibility can be certified. The configuration,
rendering
 and transfer of such records and voting content should use formats that
utilize content
 mark-up language techniques such as the widely adopted Extensible Mark-up
 Language (XML) syntax along with formats specified by the OASIS Election
 Mark-up Language (EML) standard.
</vote_process_terms>

David - who do I send this to as TC Chair?

John





"The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this
email by mistake please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
Opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily
represent the opinion of the Local e-Government Standards Body. All sent
and received email from the Local e-Government Standards Body is
automatically scanned for the presence of computer viruses and security
issues."

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php