RE: [election-services] FW: CIQ Specifications V3.0 - Release Notes

["Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>]

John,

The only specific is that it will be a conscious action to update EML to
take account of this, and we will have to decide when (and if) to do this. I
think the wish list is the place for this so we don't forget it.

Regards

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borras, John [mailto:John.Borras@legsb.gov.uk]
> Sent: 19 July 2005 11:13
> To: election-services@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [election-services] FW: CIQ Specifications V3.0 - Release Notes
>
>
> Our EML standard points to the use of the xAL standard for
> addresses.  The CIQ TC has just produced a new draft of their
> specification and would welcome any comments from other users.
> So if anyone have any issues with this new version or sees any
> consequences for EML will they please let me know.
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ram Kumar [mailto:kumar.sydney@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 July 2005 13:51
> To: Borras, John
> Subject: CIQ Specifications V3.0 - Release Notes
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> Please find enclosed the CIQ Specifications Version 3.0 - Release
> notes that summarise the differences between V2.0 and 3.0 CIQ
> specifications.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ram
>
> "The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee. If you
> receive this email by mistake please notify the sender and delete
> it immediately. Opinions expressed are those of the individual
> and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Local
> e-Government Standards Body. All sent and received email from the
> Local e-Government Standards Body is automatically scanned for
> the presence of computer viruses and security issues."
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.1/51 - Release Date: 18/07/2005
>