RE: [election-services] Open letter in response to E2E voting articles in the October Communications of the ACM journal (Volume 51 No.10 10/08)

["Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>]



It seems a lot easier to just put an X on a piece of paper.

 

Anything that makes the voting process too complicated is not going to get accepted.

 

Regards

 

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: 15 October 2008 15:26
To: EML TC
Subject: RE: [election-services] Open letter in response to E2E voting articles in the October Communications of the ACM journal (Volume 51 No.10 10/08)

Just an update to note that I found the direct link to the ACM E2E article:

http://mags.acm.org/communications/200810/?pg=18

 

Plus - Google search on "ACM E2E voting" turns up some interesting references. 

 

Thanks, DW

 

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Open letter in response to electronic voting articles in the OctoberCommunications of the ACM journal (Volume 51 No.10 10/08)

• From: "David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>
• To:
• Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:15:28 -0700

Reference: October Communications of the ACM journal (Volume 51 No.10 10/08)

http://mags.acm.org/communications/200810/?CFID=5384174&CFTOKEN=38021074

 

Open Letter on E2E Voting Systems.pdf

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php