[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [election-services] Deprecating EML 120 for EML 330 in V6
David The simple answer surely has to be, if there’s stuff in 120 that’s
not in 330 then it needs to be added to the later before we can delete the 120.
We cannot afford to lose any data in this exercise as we established way back
that the 120 was a necessary process that had to be part of EML. So unless I’m
misunderstanding your question all the orange stuff has to be added. I assume all the orange stuff about addresses is the result of
your CIQ import, and that needs to be in 330. I don’t see what your query is about the signature stuff – can you
be more explicit about which items are confusing you. If you think we need a quick telecon to go through this, and
maybe other bits of V6, then let’s set that up. Thanks for your efforts so far. John From: David RR Webber (XML)
[mailto:david@drrw.info] Team, Attached is a spreadsheet I autogenerated using CAM - comparing
the components of the 120 to the 330. I have labelled those items in 120 that appear to not
be in the 330 in orange. Can we sanity check these please? Seems like the signature
stuff may be something we need to resolve? Is there anything else? If you want to provide feedback -
probably easiest is to edit the spreadsheet - and mark those items we need to
add to the 330 accordingly (green). I've also included the EML 330 dictionary of the core components
CCTS - so you can further analysis what may already be in the 330 that can be
applied for the 120. Once we have this all resolved - then I plan to remove the 120
from the V6. Thanks, DW |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]