Re: [election-services] EML v6 CHANGES - TC MEETING

[Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall@berkeley.edu>]

For the "spoilt" naming issue, we essentially want something that
communicates "needs human intervention", no?  What about "unclear" or
"indeterminate"?

For the "Do not see any provision for control contests." issue, isn't
this just a contingent contest setup (where one contest depends on the
selection made in a previous one)?  I don't understand the practical
need, if not.  Maybe this is getting at choices presented on the
ballot that aren't actual votes (like a straight-party selection
choice).

best, Joe

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate
UC Berkeley School of Information
Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
http://josephhall.org/