[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: ITU and Using CAP with "Digital Signage"
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the dissemination here. The Study Group 16 rapporteur responsible for this work item responded with the somewhat difficult to understand note below. He also references some obscure PCP-TDR group that seems to have last met in 2006. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/pcptdr/Pages/default.aspx The last email on their list was in 2010. My tenor was somewhat harsh, but the group involved here - ETRI - seems to simply develop its own agendas and work and simply does what it wants oblivious to anyone else. It may require some substantial OASIS or governmental pressure here to underscore that the protocol and services originate in OASIS, and they have an obligation to collaborate before doing anything. --tony Thank you for your profound suggestions. I am a Rapporteur of Q14/16, and added Cc: to WP2/16 Chiarman Mr Jeong because of importance of this correspond. Firlstlly, Q14/16 highly respect CAP, and does not intend to make a document opposed to CAP. New work item plan to be one of specifications of out-of-home services applying CAP specifications. As you mentioned-below, Q14/16 alone can not dealt with critical disseminating protcols like CAP. The new work item will study mechanisms to treat information limited to the small domain where a digital signage terminal is installed in. The _expression_ of the editor's note seems to make you confused, Q14/16 has beforehand surveyed relevant specification including CAP within another work item "Digital signage: Requiremetns of disaster information services" (TD 125-WP2/16). https://www.itu.int/md/dologin_md.asp?lang=en&id=T13-SG16-131028-TD-WP2-0125!!MSW-E Q14/16 reviewed at least documents in the context of Telecommunications for Disaster Relief and Mitigation - Partnership Co-ordination Panel (PCP-TDR) including ITU-T, ETSI and OASIS. Therefore meaning of the editor's note is "review the specifications again carefully from the view points of providing local services." Q14/16 also wants to make and keep good harmonization with Q4/17 and Q11/17 and SG2. BR, Tanikawa On 11/7/2013 3:18 AM, Christian, Eliot wrote:
|
Attachment:
T13-SG16-131028-TD-WP2-0152!!MSW-E.doc
Description: MS-Word document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]