Re: [emergency] EDXL-DE 2.0 for the F2F - Objectivity, Subjectivity and Interpretation.

[Gary Ham <gham@grandpaham.com>]

If Jacob is right,  DE 1.0 needs an errata even before 2.0 comes out.  The circle was meant to be the same for both specs.

On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jacob Westfall wrote:

>> It's the second comma that gets you the format is at,long radious  
>> (e.g. 0,0 15000000)
> 
> The format for EDXL-DE is clearly "latitude, longitude, radius"  The example is incorrect.  It is also different than the CAP format for a circle, and any messages using the CAP format for circle in DE messages are incorrect.  The DE definition for polygon is murkier as it does not clearly define the delimiter for the lat,lon pairs and whether there is to be any space between these commas.
> 
> -- 
> jake@jpw.biz
> --
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 

Gary Ham
http://grandpaham.com
703-899-6241