Re: Catalogs 1.1 WD

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
| In Section 3 we say the public identifier for XML Catalogs 
| is "-//OASIS//DTD XML Catalogs V1.0//EN".  I agree, but this
| is all the more reason not to call this 1.1 instead of 1.0.

Yes, 1.1 was in retrospect a really bad idea. I'll fix that and call it 1.0
second edition or something.

| In section 4.3 Rewrite entries, we say "rewriting can be applied 
| to the base URI that precedes the fragment identifier."  Since I
| don't think you really mean "base URI" in the Infoset or RFC 2396
| sense, I think this is a poor choice of terms.  I could suggest
| the official term from RFC 2396, but I doubt most people would
| know what it meant, so I guess we need to be more descriptive
| here.  But I don't like using "base URI".

Good catch!

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in
XML Standards Architect | semantics.--Homer J. Simpson, BABF07
Web Tech. and Standards |
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/fvqROyltUcwYWjsRAul3AJ48nes1BBrfBRuotvIlpuZP9HsTQQCffKqz
WIrmBd0usi87ot+UOkzeFXg=
=tfgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----