RE: Re: [etmf] Groups - Comment Log 6/24-7/24/14 uploaded

["Agard, Michael" <magard@consultparagon.com>]

After some discussion with Jennifer, I am changing my vote to yes.

 

Metadata Vocabulary and Specification edits initially to be followed by the machine code and (core metadata changes)

 

As an FYI, I will be on vacation the week of Aug 4, so I will miss the next meeting.

 

Michael Agard | Principal Consultant | Paragon Solutions | www.consultparagon.com

email:  magard@consultparagon.com  |  phone:  610.832.8110 | fax:  610.832.8115 | cell:  484.889.7136

 

 

** Confidential **

 

From: Agard, Michael
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 12:59 PM
To: 'etmf@lists.oasis-open.org'
Cc: Jennifer Alpert Palchak (jalpert@carelex.org)
Subject: Re: [etmf] Groups - Comment Log 6/24-7/24/14 uploaded

 

I vote no.

 

I would recommend to have 3 groups:

1.       Metadata

2.       Specification revisions

3.       Vocabulary

 

If you want only two groups, I suggest combining the metadata and specification groups and having a group dedicated to the vocabulary.  There have been 3 webinars, plus the monthly TMF Reference Model group meeting in recent weeks.  I think we will see  a lot of comments coming in on vocabulary from the TMF Reference Model group in the next couple of weeks. 

 

Michael Agard | Principal Consultant | Paragon Solutions | www.consultparagon.com

email:  magard@consultparagon.com  |  phone:  610.832.8110 | fax:  610.832.8115 | cell:  484.889.7136

 

 

** Confidential **