[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [geolang-comment] Code set list
To structure this debate somewhat, here is the complete list of code sets that have been discussed/proposed so far, in the order I think we may want to cover them. ISO 639 http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/langhome.html ISO 3166 http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/ RFC 3066 http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-tags ISO 3166-2 http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/ UN/M49 http://www.un.org/Depts/unsd/methods/m49.htm USMARC http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/languages/ ISO 15924 http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso15924/ UN/LOCODE http://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/main.htm IANA charset registry http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets Opinions about code sets that we should drop, that should be added, or comments on the proposed order of the code sets? For the first six code sets we already have proposals, in some cases even more than one proposal. The only one that looks like it will -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC