"
HumanML will not be
very helpful here unless a micro-analysis of communications
is needed, and even
then, it will be difficult to do in real-time. However, what
you are asking for
is a short-term solution and that can be done as you suggest
and will work toward
exposing the deliberate use of miscommunication to delay
the GTO
processes.
"
***
I have been addressing some similar problems regarding the use of data
aggregation methods on text and data sources :
Micro-analysis of communication does occur in some intelligence systems,
using link analysis. What I am proposing, to the US White House, is
that Informational Transparancy over all Internet Transactions is immediately
(within six months) possible. However, the issues of theoretical
linguistics (centered around the Whorf Hypothesis) should remind us that
knowledge mapping in communities of practice is NOT the same as machine knowing
of data invariance and patterns expressed via computer programs.
Yes? Do we agree on this issue?
One problem (Informational Transparancy in Artificial Worlds - like the
Internet) is SIMPLE (and yet very complicated) and the other (Informational
Transparancy on the Natural World - the task of basic science) is
Complex.
I am also involved in knowing how other scholars are developing
behavioral models related to deliberate use of miscommunication in a proposal to
the White House regarding a defense system against cyber
war.
I have observed the HumanMarkup standards development. I am not yet
sure how this community's work might be used in a stratified taxonomy consisting
of four layers. The bottom two layers are primarily a measurement of the
data (bit) stream. However the two top levels are ontology streams that
need to "know" human behavioral states and behaviors. Like my comments
about the current state of the art in the Topic Maps community, my test of a
system for the mark-up of human behavioral patterns requires agility. This
means that the ontology, be it a topic map or a semiotics sign system
descriptive of human behavior, must be formative in the situated
moment. We may make comments about situational logics and
processes later.
Not many individuals have a theory of state gesture mechanism that is
needed to produce a Knowledge Operating System (KOS). A KOS is not IT
alone, and in fact must be much simpler than the current generation of knowledge
technologies such as Autonomy, Semio, or Tacit Knowledge systems.
I invite those in the HumanMarkup comments forum to join in a
conversation regarding event chemistries and other supporting work
at:
Perhaps a reporting mechanism might be established to summarize the
discussion in the eventChemistry forum and conveying this summarization to the
humanmarkup-comments forum, so that the other important discussion in the
humanmarkup-comments forum will not be diffused by this new
thread.