RE: [humanmarkup-comment] As If Article and thoughts about attractingattention to our cause

[Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>]

Nice question. IMHO, we have nothing to do with it; other standards or
application dependent factors should address that. We are about
information, not identity.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:07 PM
> To: 'Rex Brooks'; humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [humanmarkup-comment] As If Article and thoughts 
> about attrac tingattention to our cause
> 
> 
> What are the positions of contributors on the question 
> of whether or not HumanML applications should provide 
> "identity", that is, directly support identification 
> processes for real human users?   
> 
> It seems to me that it should not... directly.  I suspect 
> a lot of the bewilderment over HumanML and much of the 
> consternation starts there.  If we eliminate that, 
> of the proposed secondary applications, which would 
> be affected?
> 
> len
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>