[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [huml-comment] Request for a motion on PC-33 -Section 4.4.6-r ace
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]Thanks, Len,I understand this a little better now. I'm afraid I'm more concerned with a compelling reason to remove the attribute race from the attributeGroup phyicalDescriptors. I am satsified that we can get to the current usages through this set of properties method. As of now, for me, the argument that it is not objective is sufficient, and if were not a term used in current practices, it would be compelling in an of itself, but with current usages, however one views those usages, it doesn't rise to the level of compelling for me and I would be happier with a clearly compelling reason the completely trumps current usages, which can nevertheless still be accommodated. That does not mean I favor retaining it. I don't.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC