RE: [huml-comment] LMNL toolkit for HumanML

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Gavin has the chops.  No worries.  I'll be interested 
in his comments on the primary because we've not applied 
it and there may be unanticipated difficulties.  I'll 
be happy to correspond to explain the rationale.

That said, I have zero knowledge of LMNL.

The AIML language should be another research topic 
for us given Vigdor's queries to the Big List for 
VRML.  A rules language for AI coupled to the primary 
types in HumanML could be a very powerful application 
for driving avatars.

len