[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [id-cloud] Architecture for ID-Cloud
At 10:55 AM 8/10/2010, Michael Stiefel wrote: >Throwing more fuel on the fire... > >Profiles are not synonymous with architecture as I understand them. Agreed. >Use cases outline how a service/application/subsystem behaves given some >external action. This includes both normal and error cases. This corresponds >to the approach we have started. Agreed. >A profile might include what technologies could be used to implement >the use cases. Agreed. >Even a reference architecture is a fairly complicated beast because you have >to think about implementation details and prescriptive guidance. Is that a >path we want to go down? I personally am interested in ID-cloud >architecture, and Thomas' questions are a good starting point, but that >seems out of scope for the TC. I assumed the question of architecture was one of timing/priority, not whether it was in-scope or out-of-scope. If mistaken, happy to take guidance. That said, not trying to stimulate an architecture discussion if the group isn't willing to do so. I assumed the several comments offered during the call yesterday implied there are several in the group that are. Again, happy to take guidance if mistaken. Tom
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]