[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: IMI TC Minutes, Dec 17th
1. Call to order/roll call Mario Ivkovic A-SIT, Zentrum fur sichere Informationstec... Jeffrey Broberg CA* John Bradley Individual Michael McIntosh Individual Marc Goodner Microsoft Michael Jones Microsoft Anthony Nadalin Microsoft Lost voting status None Gained voting status None 2. Approve minutes from previous call Dec 3rd http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00005.html 3. Interop demo at RSA http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00083.html Looking at spaces now, several other TCs looking at participating TC would define scenarios that drive our participation OASIS would manage signage, venue logistics, time schedule between TCs in booth Other participants must be OASIS members, should be members of TC but not required Our TC working with OSIS on scenarios Focus around ICAM profiles which could be an issue as some companies working on those scenarios are not OASIS members Our scenario would focus around the ICAM profile to get GSA/NIH involvement Dee will setup an interop list for the IMI TC Tony, John and Mike will work on recruiting other participants 4. Issues IMI-23 SAML 1.1 token encoding profile needed http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-23 Resolved to close as we have created this profile IMI-24 SAML 2.0 token encoding profile needed http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/IMI-24 Resolved to close as we have created this profile IMI-25: ic09:X509Principal and ic09:X509SubjectAndIssuerintroduced in locations that violate IMI 1.0 schema http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00002.html Resolved, part of latest IMI 1.1 draft IMI-26 Conflict between SAML 2.0 token profile and WS-Trust http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00050.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00033.html Resolved, part of latest 2.0 profile IMI-27 Need for more specificity in issuer language for SAML 2.0 token profile http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00051.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00039.html Resolved, part of latest 2.0 profile IMI-28 Requirement for AudienceRestriction when AppliesTo provided may be overly restrictive http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00052.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00034.html Close with no action SAML 2.0 token profile Current drafts http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00075.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00076.html Diff: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00077.html Editorial issues remain with draft, assigned to editors to resolve SAML 1.1 token profile Current draft: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00047.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00048.html Needs some editing related to IMI-28, otherwise complete for previous issues Please review before next call IMI-29 displayType Object Tag Property http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00055.html Allows web RP to display card image inline in page IMI-30 requireUserInteraction Object Tag Property http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00056.html Allows RP to require explicit user interaction before submitting a card, allows override of card auto submission IMI-31 tryGetTokenAutomatic Object Tag Method http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00057.html Similar to passive authN request in SAML 2 or check immediate in OpenID Assumption that default card selected by user or provisioned by administrators Triggered via script, not user interaction IMI-32 hasCapability Object Tag Method http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/imi/200912/msg00058.html From OSIS discussions, allows selectors to advertise capabilities they have, e.g. card tile support or authN mechanisms Proposed list of capabilities, but this is extensible and expected TC may define more over time Proposed resolutions for issues 29 – 32 above accepted for inclusion in new IMI 1.1 draft and assigned to editors 5. Other business Next call is Jan 7th and back to biweekly schedule Discussion of both chairs being from the same company Primary concern is optics external to TC, nothing in OASIS rules require chairs be from different companies No action decided in absence of request from TC membership 6. Adjournment |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]