Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object

[Rolly Chambers <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com>]

Title: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object

Just to eliminate any confusion, I wrote that the Justice and Public Safety XML Data Element Definitions Draft 0.1.0 (April 26, 2002) (the "Justice Data Dictionary" -- not the Court Filing 1.1 DTD) includes a "person" element, but does not include either an "actor" or a "role" element.

 

The Court Filing 1.1 DTD does include an "actor" and a "role" element, but not a "person" element.

 

Rolly Chambers 

----- Original Message -----

From: Krause, Catherine

To: (legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org)

Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:43 PM

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed "person" object

<snip>

- Someone said that "actor" is not used in Court Filing 1.1.  It is used in Court Filing 1.1, although if you do a "search" for it in the PDF document, you don't find it (not sure why that is).  We are using "actor" in our implementation for the filer.  We are not doing case initiation in this phase, but in the future I anticipate that we may sometimes use actor for different purposes such as parties to a case, which is not always a person, as has been pointed out by at least one of the people in this e-mail exchange. 

<snip>