RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Ple aseReview by September 24t h

["Poindexter, Gary W" <gpoindexter@kpmg.com>]

Title: Query and Response Specification - Please Review by September 24th

Relatively minor questions and observations:

 

1:

"Wherever possible, the parameterName should coincide with the established elements and attributes of the LegalXML data dictionary and contain the same information"

 

Remove the "Wherever possible,"

 

2:

How about a Boolean parameter on the query to eliminate the query labels in the response.

 

3:

Within a standard query why not allow the requested columns in the response? The columns would have to be applicable to the query (i.e. couldn't request charges within a getCaseActorRole).

 

gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Rowley, Moira [mailto:Moira.Rowley@acs-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:06 PM
To: 'legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Query and Response Specification - Please Review by September 24t h

The CMS API subcommittee submits to the Court Filing Technical Committee for your consideration the attached documents.

1. Query and Response Specification
2. Issues and Notes Document
   

There are a handful of issues that we are referring to the larger group for consideration and response. Please note that this is the same structure that we will use for the CMS API.  That requirement was not considered or included when the CMS API requirements documents was written, as the Query work was then being undertaken by a separate group.  But it makes sense, and we worked under that assumption in reviewing and editing this specification.

We extend our thanks to Dwight Daniels for agreeing to take on the job of completing this specification - picking up the project from Marty Halvorson.  Dwight patiently worked through many issues with the subcommittee and updated the specification several times to accommodate the group's decisions.

Please post your comments and suggestions by Tuesday September 24, so we can have everything ready for final approval at our October Face to Face meeting in Boston.  Thank you.

Moira Rowley
Dwight Daniels
Shane Durham
Tom Smith
Christopher Smith
Gloria Diaz

<<QueryAndResponseStandardDraft2002_08_20.doc>> <<QnRIssuesForTC_082702.doc>>

*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. 

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.         
*****************************************************************************