legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Proposed Procedures on Version Numbering andFile Naming
- From: "Winters, Roger" <Roger.Winters@METROKC.GOV>
- To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:28:58 -0800
Title: Message
Hello, ECF TC
members,
From the
Minutes circulated today there was an item concerning proposed version
numbering for specifications (see below). Shane Durham and I discussed that
proposal and decided to develop it as a proposed rule on version numbering and
file naming. I have developed that proposal (attached to this email in Word
format) and Shane was kind enough to review it and make
suggestions. The scope for this covers specifications, other
deliverables, and the file names they would have, e.g., when published
to the TC's Web site. The file names will serve as an aid to and indicator
of version management. There is also guidance in this proposal on how
to interpret the relationship between different specifications based on their
version numbers and some suggestions on how to refer to and compare them in
normal English, that is, without citing the numbers.
Please note
that the author of a document does not have to master the methodology nor
memorize how to construct a file name. That is a service provided by the Editor,
based on a request for guidance or a copy of an initial draft or new version of
a document or file.
I suggest
that this proposal be an item for discussion and vote at the face-to-face
meeting in Las Vegas, December 12-13. (The TC Chairs will, of course, set up the
Agenda.) Of course, comments on the Listserv in the meantime would contribute to
the discussion and perhaps make the need for further discussion at the
meeting minimal. If approved there, as-is or with modifications, I assume the
same method John Greacen described today for the Minutes--unless there
are objections to them, the decisions recorded in the Minutes will
become final--would apply.
Please let me
know of any questions, etc. Please post comments to the
Listserv.
Regards,
Roger
Roger
Winters, Editor
Electronic
Court Filing Technical Committee
Legal XML
Member Section of OASIS
Electronic Court
Records Manager
King
County
Department of Judicial Administration
516 Third Avenue, E-609
MS: KCC-JA-0609
Seattle, Washington
98104
V:
(206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906
roger.winters@metrokc.gov
From the
Minutes:
Mr. Shane Durham discussed
versioning rules for Technical Committee specifications. He recommended a
three-level version numbering scheme. Changes to the first number would
indicate non-compatibility with prior versions. Changes to the second
number would indicate that the newer version would parse prior versions, but not
vice versa. Changes to the third number would reflect insignificant
changes, such as adding content to replace holder other changes
that do not reflect a change
in the XML. A trivial example would be adding a space or comment to the
DTD. Ms. Robin Gibson pointed out that some documents may not reflect this
new rule and their version numbers will NOT be updated.
Mr. Durham will write this
up, Mr. Winters will edit, and it will be sent to the
list.
Attachment:
Info-Candidate-LegalXML-ECF-Winters-VersionNumbers-00.DOC
Description: MS-Word document
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC