I think it is
important to retain the current name (which we have had from the start) at
least until after Blue has been completed. Reasons include that there is a
substantial court interest in this work and, further, that the associated
transactions envisioned, for example, in including e-service, relate to the
judicial process and court cases. Even transactions, such as discovery
exchange, which do not require direct involvement by the judge or clerk
(except to enforce rules), would not take place except for there being a
court case involved.
I reserve the
right to be persuaded otherwise, but I think that such a change should be
the product of deliberation and review - including discussion at a
face-to-face meeting.
Regards,
Roger
Roger
Winters
Programs and
Projects Manager
King
County
Department of Judicial
Administration
516 Third Avenue,
E-609 MS: KCC-JA-0609
Seattle, Washington
98104
V: (206) 296-7838 F:
(206) 296-0906
roger.winters@metrokc.gov
-----Original
Message-----
From: Cabral,
James E. [mailto:JCabral@mtgmc.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 10:11
AM
To: Dallas Powell;
Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling]
Charter revision second draft
Given our decision
to include e-service in the scope of Blue, this makes sense to
me.
Jim
Cabral
From:
Dallas Powell [mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 10:05
AM
To: Electronic Court
Filing Technical Committeee
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling]
Charter revision second draft
I would like throw out a change
in naming from "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committee" to "Electronic
Filing Technical Committee" and emphasize in our system as an environment
for legal documents. The intent is ease the distinction between what
we do and the data exchange environment for IJIS or attorney to attorney for
notification which may not always require a court to intervene as was
discussed in the f2f?
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, September 23, 2004 5:45 PM
Subject:
[legalxml-courtfiling] Charter revision second
draft
I attach a "clean" version of
the proposed revised Technical Committee charter. At the face to
face in Seattle, the group present proposed that specific tasks and
deadlines not appear in the charter, but rather be posted as a unique
document and updated on the TC web page. Those items change too
frequently to be appropriate for a charter, with its lengthy amendment
approval process - which includes the OASIS Board of Directors. I
have made appropriate changes to reflect that position. I have also
clarified the discussion of the action taken by the COSCA/NACM Joint
Technology Committee on the four specifications developed by the TC's
predecessor organization.
I ask Robin Gibson to put this
revised charter to a vote using OASIS's Kavi system. Please be aware
that it must be approved by the OASIS Board before it takes
effect.
John M.
Greacen
Greacen
Associates, LLC
HCR 78, Box
23
Regina, New
Mexico 87046
505-289-2164
505-289-2163
(fax)
505-780-1450
(cell)
To unsubscribe from this
mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-courtfiling/members/leave_workgroup.php.