[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Please review 'Proposed Service Models for ECF3'
After reviewing the discussion points and
positions described below I would suggest that we hedge our bets. My bet is that in the fullness of time the
first option will win out. I believe there will be a function of
education and removing of fear uncertainty and doubt. Given that, for the first release of court
filing 2.0, we should only support option one. By doing so, we do not
preclude the option of supporting option two and a subsequent release. If
there is not a solid, educated business demand then we will not implement the
and a subsequent release. However, I believe that is a valid option in
the roadmap. Regards, Don Donald L. Bergeron From: Cabral, James E.
[mailto:JCabral@mtgmc.com] Everyone,
Thursday
and Friday last week, John Greacen, Christoph Hoashi-Erhardt, another MTG
consultant, and I made a first attempt at developing a domain model and GJXDM
mapping for electronic service. We wrote up a quick 3 page summary of the
model and solicited initial feedback from some of the vendors actively
participating on the TC with the expectation that we would send it to TC
Monday. We did not expect the considerable response we received. With
the hope of coming to a consensus as a TC as soon as possible, I have
summarized the comments over the last couple days and a proposed alternative
model in the attached document. I have also attached a service cover
sheet that Tybera is currently developing with As
you will see from the main document, the main decision point is whether we need
to support one or two service models. We request feedback
from all TC members on this important issue as soon as possible so that we can
finish up the specification. Please be sure to send your response to the
entire list. If you can make your comments via "Track Changes"
in Word, that would simplify our aggregation of the comments. I will leave
it to the TC chairs to propose a decision making process. <<Proposed Service Models for
ECF3.doc>> <<NEF Draft 1 dated 04-20-05.doc>> Jim
Cabral James
E. Cabral Jr. The
information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it
is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from
any computer. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]