RE: ECF WS SIP and Reliability

[James E Cabral <jec@mtgmc.com>]

Bob and Scott,

 

FYI.  Please find links to drafts of ECF 4.01 Errata 01 and the ECF WS SIP that address all feedback the TC has received from Springboard to date.  The TC will wait to finish and approve these changes to allow for more feedback from Springboard.

 

ECF 4.01 Errata 01

 

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=51046&wg_abbrev=legalxml-courtfiling

 

ECF WS SIP

 

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=51051&wg_abbrev=legalxml-courtfiling

 

  Thanks,

 

Jim Cabral
MTG Management Consultants, L.L.C.
www.mtgmc.com
(206) 442-5010 Phone
(502) 509-4532 Mobile

 

Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve.

 

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 

From: Bob Slaski [mailto:slaski.bob@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 3:48 PM
To: James E Cabral
Cc: Jim Harris (jharris@ncsc.org); Scott Serich
Subject: Re: ECF WS SIP and Reliability

 

Jim,

 

I believe that you are correct in which case you will need to specify the WS-ReliableMessaging version overtly.

 

Bob

 

 

Bob Slaski

571.241.2114

slaski.bob@gmail.com

 

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:02 PM, James E Cabral <jec@mtgmc.com> wrote:

Bob,

 

Jim Harris and I are updating the WS SIP based on the following feedback Open Networks provided to the ECF TC.

 

•       WS-Reliability, WS-ReliableMessaging 1.0 and WS-ReliableMessaging 1.1 are referenced in the SIP

•       Recommendation - Specify the required reliable messaging standard(s) or just reference the Web Services Profile which specifies the reliable messaging standard(s)

 

I have highlighted the references to reliability in the specification.  Are you suggesting that all of these could simply by replaced with a reference to WS-I Reliable Secure Profile 1.0?  If so, I think we have a version compatibility conflict with the Basic Profile.  The SIP currently references Basic Profile 1.1 and Basic Security Profile 1.0.   My understanding is that the Reliable Secure Profile 1.0 is designed to be composed with Basic Profile 1.2/2..0 and Basic Security Profile 1.0/1.1. 

 

http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/ReliableSecureProfile-1.0-2010-11-09.html

 

If this is correct, unless we update support to the Basic Profile 1.2, we cannot use Reliable Secure Profile.

 

Thoughts?

 

James E. Cabral Jr., Partner

MTG Management Consultants, L.L.C.

401 Second Avenue South, Suite 240

Seattle, Washington 98104-3858

www.mtgmc.com

(206) 442-5010 Phone

(502) 509-4532 Mobile

(206) 442-5011 Fax

jcabral@mtgmc.com

 

Helping our clients make a difference in the lives of the people they serve.

 

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.