[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] RE: ECF 4.0 GetDocument specification/implementation
There is another issue that you might want to consider for ECF 5. Recently in criminal efiling a document was sent in. The clerk recorded the information and documents as public. The enotifications went out
allowing people to access the documents. Within 10 minutes of the recording the judge determined that the documents were not public and the security settings on the document and docket entry changed in the CMS. These conditions are a problem for some courts.
We have since defined a new communication with the CMS to send a security update back to the enotification system which needs to extend to all EFSP to delete and deny further access to the documents. We have also seen similar issues in mental health where
they need items expunged. This new communications from the CMS to the eFiling notification or for EFSP that cache documents need to be able to expunge / delete / deny access based on security changes that occur after distribution. Dallas From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of James E Cabral OK, I’m hearing an action item for ECF 5. Who wants to own it? Jim McMillan? Gary? Dallas? Bryant? __ From: Jim McMillan Thanks Dallas for the clarification. The document issue might be something that JTC/CITOC could provide some leadership on as it is a perceived and real structural issue that
either needs rules clarification or new rules.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]