Re: [office-collab] GCT breaks combatibility

[Frank Meies <frank.meies@oracle.com>]

Hi Andreas,

as far as I know there's already a consensus that for this reason the removed content has to be moved to the tracked changes section.

Regards,

Frank

On 26.04.2011 16:19, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:

1303827579.28855.7.camel@kirkman" type="cite">

In the past it was possible for a ODF 1.0 or 1.1 consumer to make sense
out of a ODF 1.2 file by handling unknown elements like foreign
elements. I strongly believe that this property should be retained
within ODF 1.x. Unfortunately GCT makes this impossible, considering the
following example from the GCT proposal (6.12.2):

<text:p>
How text is deleted 
<delta:removed-content delta:removal-change-idref=”ct2”>
or 
<text:span text:style=”bold”> removed</text:span>
like this
</delta:removed-content>
from a paragraph.
</text:p>

An application considering delta:removed-content a foreign element would
show:
How text is deleted or removed like this from a paragraph.
rather than
How text is deleted from a paragraph.

Andreas


 

--

Frank Meies | Software Developer
Phone: +49 49 23646 500
Oracle OFFICE GBU

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven

Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment