[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Semantics
On 3/6/06, Eike Rathke <erack@sun.com> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 17:22:02 +0100, Tomas Mecir wrote: > > > That is the "C" locale, which is already used for all numeric content. > > > You still don't solve any string-to-number conversion issues with that. > > > > Don't I ? What I'm proposing is that automated string-to-number > > conversions, while computing, are done using the C locale. > > Now go and explain that to every user who hasn't a clue about the C or > any other locale. I consider that proposal even worse than every other > automatic conversion I came across so far.. If I was proposing to use, say, Chinese locale as a world-wide default, then I agree, it would have been a bad idea. But - C locale ? C locale is the same as US locale, right ? Nothing terribly inconvenient, and it's easy, too. Nobody is forcing the user to use the string conversions, if he doesn't want to. Each user can simply forget string->number conversions if he wants to, and he ends up with what you want. It's just an extra feature, provided for convenience. Why is it bad ? Locale problems are not there, I'm not aware of any others. We want complex numbers, to implement them in a reasonable fashion, string->number conversions are a huge plus. / Tomas
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]