[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-formula] Groups -OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision(OpenDocument-part2-draft18-editor-revision.odt) uploaded
Hi Patrick, On Monday, 2010-02-01 13:50:04 -0500, Patrick Durusau wrote: > We still need to decide what to do with the portable language. > > One option would be to move it to a normative annex that treats > instances of syntax. The no revision of the portable language speaking > of documents would be necessary. I think moving the portable document text away to a separated annex wouldn't be good. It is much easier to understand if it is kept within context. Earlier we agreed to convert portable documents language to portability notes, and in a second step turn parts of those notes to normative text where necessary. >> Apart from that there's a problem with removing the word "typically". >> For example, a sentence like >> >> "A currency is a subtype of number which typically is displayed with >> a currency symbol." >> >> just said that. Removing typically there it suddenly becomes >> a definition "A currency is a subtype of number which is displayed with >> a currency symbol.", but that's not true, the actual display depends on >> the number format assigned to the cell. The same with Percentage, >> whether or not the number is multiplied by 100 and a percent sign is >> displayed is not defined by the type. >> >> > Well, but the display of any subtype depends upon the number format > assigned to the cell. Yes. > The issue with "typically" is that we don't say when currency with > "typically" appear with a currency symbol and when it will not. > > To say "typically" is vague. > > If we want to say: "A currency is a subtype of number that may appear > with or without a currency symbol or with other formatting depending > upon the number format assigned to the cell where it appears." > > That avoids the vagueness of "typically" and doesn't leave any doubt as > to the mechanism that is producing the difference in presentation. I'm fine with that. Eike -- Automatic string conversions considered dangerous. They are the GOTO statements of spreadsheets. --Robert Weir on the OpenDocument formula subcommittee's list.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]