[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] W3C RDFa
Hi Elias, do you know if and when it is planned that these documents will become Working Drafts in the terms of the W3C process [1]? As I stated earlier they are currently "without official standing within the W3C". Best regards, Svante [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/tr.html#maturity-levels Elias Torres wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax > > Those are the correct links. They are not finalized, they are simply > working drafts, but like I mentioned in the call, we have enough > design for what we need when it comes to the set of attributes in the > ODF XML content documents. This way we won't have a dependency on the > standardization of RDFa. However, the closer we are to the final spec, > the better it can be for everyone. It's also important to note, that > we have a slightly different situation than RDFa because we have a > custom XML set of schemas as opposed to (X)HTML to deal with so in one > or way or another it might be hard to perfectly align ourselves with > all of RDFa requirements and design decisions. In addition, we'll be > using RDF/XML and other standards (like XML, RelaxNG, etc) for the > meta.xml parts of our specification. > > -Elias > > On 11/23/06, Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@sun.com> wrote: >> >> Bruce D'Arcus wrote: >> > On Nov 23, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Svante Schubert wrote: >> >> PS: The RDFa link from >> >> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Metadata_Field_Brainstorming does >> >> not give clues about the specification, either. >> > >> > Feel free to add them. >> Sure, as soon we know of what specification we are actually talking >> about. >> >> Svante >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]