Re: [office-metadata] Linking in a vocabulary

[John.F.Madden@duke.edu, MD@duke.edu, PhD <john.madden@duke.edu>]

Whoops, just noticed a couple of major boners in the n3 and rdf.

Please replace with these versions:

Clinic Note.n3

Clinic Note.rdf

On May 4, 2007, at 6:59 PM, John F. Madden, MD, PhD wrote:

> Patrick,
>
> Still not done, but getting closer.
>
> <Clinic Note.n3>
> <Clinic Note.odt>
> <Clinic Note.rdf>
> <content.xml>
>
> (1) The odt is just an OpenOffice save of the un-doctored document.
>
> (2) The content.xml has all the necessary xml:id's added to it, and  
> is therefore a mock-up of what that would look like **for the case  
> of non-inline metadata***.
>
> (3) The RDF is close to, but not yet exactly what you would need to  
> put in the odf package as the non-inline metadata rdf file (there  
> are e.g. some "fake" SNOMED codes and incorrect IRI's).
>
> (4) The N3 was used to compose the RDF, and it has lots of comments  
> to help clarify (I hope) what my (semantic) intentions were.
>
> (5) I have NOT yet gotten very far into the in-line metadata  
> version, but keep your hopes up for tomorrow.
>
> John
>
>
>