[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] RDF: What can we say?
Bruce, Thanks! A very good starting point. Although I would pitch the advantages as far as the document and its content more than the broader Semantic Web vision. People who already know RDF have drunk the cool-aid on that issue and where I think we need to sell our proposal is to doc heads who really want more sophisticated metadata in documents. Sort of a "What's in it for me?" sort of approach. Well, if you have the ODF metadata proposal you can....., sort of answer. Immediate payoff, gratification, etc. I want people to really take advantage of the proposal for their own ends and if that fits into something bigger by and by, fine by me. Hope you are having a great evening! Patrick Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > On May 16, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Patrick Durusau wrote: > >> Anyone want to volunteer to take a cut at it? >> >> Oh, we might also steal some ideas for diagrams from the RDF Primer. >> Some folks prefer text while other react well to graphics. Would not >> hurt anything to have both. > > > I can't commit to anything now because of other deadlines, but this is > a really good overview of RDF: > > <http://www.rdfabout.com/intro/> > > Bruce > > > > -- Patrick Durusau Patrick@Durusau.net Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005 Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]