Re: [office-metadata] Fwd: language

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Jun 27, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:

>>> To "odf:Package node" in the second case wouldn't make sense.
> I would assume that it is still an RDF odf:Package node, but just no 
> longer an XML odf:Package node.

You can't assume that. More importantly, it's still an XML view of 
"node." What's fundamental here is that the resource is the packaage, 
and odf:Package types it as such.

>>> To be more precise, maybe something like:
>>> "The odf:Package class refers to the OpenDocument package itself."
> Isn't precisely the individual of an odf:Package class referring to 
> the OpenDocument package itself?

Yes. I just don't know how to make that sound right.

Bruce