Re: [office] Normative examples for ODF1.1

["Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com>]

OK :-)

But just for my understanding.
If text:continue-numbering is "false" by default then
<text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"><text:p>A</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"><text:p>B</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
would result in
<text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"
text:continue-numbering="false"><text:p>A</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
<text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"
text:continue-numbering="false"><text:p>B</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>


Right ????

~Florian


>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems <Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM> 03/12/07 3:55 PM >>>
Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> but when you define "text:continue-numbering" as beeing "false" then
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"><text:p>A</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
> <text:numbered-paragraph text:style-name="L1"><text:p>B</text:p></text:numbered-paragraph>
> will result in
> 1. A
> 1. B
> 
> right? Since this isn't right the only conclusion if that the default is "true".
> 
No, the given result isn't the only correct interpretation in ODF 1.1

And again, I've to repeat the following statement:
ODF 1.1 specification doesn't specify, how numbered paragraphs form a 
certain list and thus, how a counter domain is formed for numbered 
paragraphs.
Thus, it's not clear, if the both above given numbered paragraphs form 
*one* list or *two* list.

Regards, Oliver.

> ...