Re: [office] Two proposals on SMIL

[Michael Brauer <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

Helen,

I've checked that, and it seems to me that the missing attributes have 
been added to the ODF 1.1 specification already. Can you please ask 
Ricky Gao to validate that.

Thank you

Michael

Zhi Yu Yue wrote:
> 
> I got two proposals on SMIL from IBM Notes development team. Your 
> comments are welcome.
> 
> //----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Proposal 1: Add common-anim-target-attlist to <anim:iterate> elements
> In 9.8.2, there states "if the anim:sub-item attribute of <anim:iterate> 
> has the value whole ... "
> In 13.4.4, no this attribute included in schema.
> This is conflict
> Suggest: added common-anim-target-attlist into attribute list
> <define name="animation-element" combine="choice">
>         <element name="anim:iterate">
>                 <ref name="common-anim-attlist"/>
>                 <ref name="anin-iterate-attlist"/>
>                 <ref name="common-timing-attlist"/>
>                 <ref name="common-endsync-timing-attlist"/>
>                 <ref name="common-anim-target-attlist" />
>                 <zeroOrMore>
>                         <ref name="animation-element"/>
>                 </zeroOrMore>
>         </element>
> </define>
> 
> Proposal 2: Add common-timing-attlist to 13.1 Basic Animation Elements
> In SMIL20 standard, basic animation elements also contain common timing 
> attributes.
> Suggest: add common-timing-attlist to below elements
>         13.1.1 <anim:animate>
>         13.1.2 <anim:set>
>         13.1.3 <anim:animateMotion>
>         13.1.4 <anim:animateColor>
>         13.1.5 <anim:animateTransform>
>         13.1.6 <anim:transitionFilter>
> 
> Ricky Gao (Gao Wei)
> //----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>