Re: [office] Errata: Substantive Schema Change in 15.27.22?

["Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>]

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:52 -0400, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 6) If any TC member knows of an ODF 1.0 implementation that would require 
> modification in order to remain compliant with the proposed schema change, 
> then they should speak up and say so.  We can always take this change out. 
>  But, for example, if implementations generally do not implement this 
> attribute, or if they silently have already made the spelling correction 
> in their implementations, then this may not be a problem.  By having 
> review on the TC as well as a 15-day public review, we give any 
> implementation, whether represented on the TC or not, a fair opportunity 
> to make this point.

What about ODF 1.0 implementations that do not exist yet? Is it
understood that any new ODF 1.0 implementation will have no follow the
errata?

Andreas
-- 
Andreas J. Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>
Andreas J. Guelzow