[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Question regarding ODF 1.2 specification name
Hi Michael, If you do not create either an overview document or combine into a single document, then you do not have a single specification and it will require 3 separate ballots. Mary On May 12, 2010, at 2:19 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > Hi Mary, > > On 05/11/10 20:29, Mary McRae wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> I think we've only sent 2 parts out for public review so far: Part I and Part 3. I don't believe Part 2 has been submitted for public review yet. That really doesn't matter though, if you're in effect creating a new document. > > That's true. Part 2 has not been send out for public review. >> Will you be merging into a single, comprehensive document? Or will you be creating an overview document that then ties together the 3 parts? > > The three parts will remain separate documents. There is no separate overview document, but an introduction in part 1 that explains what the content of the three parts is. > >> Since Part I was a CD04 you couldn't rename it back to CD01; CD05 makes sense as long as one of the parts hasn't reached that level yet. > > Okay. CD05 actually is my preference, since renaming the parts back to cd01 can only lead to confusion. > > Thank you for answering our questions. > > Best regards > > Michael > > > > > > >> Regards, >> Mary >> On May 11, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: >>> Mary, >>> >>> so far the OpenDocument TC approved the three parts of the ODF 1.2 >>> specification individually as committee drafts, and has send them out >>> for public review individually. That is, we have an >>> >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-part1-cd4, an OpenDocument-v1.2-part2-cd2 and an >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-part3-cd1. >>> >>> Because the three parts of the ODF 1.2 specification shall become one >>> single OASIS standard, we now want to approve the three parts as a single committee draft, and we also want to send them out for a single public review that covers all three parts. >>> >>> What is the correct name that the new CD would get when approved, and >>> what would be the names of the three parts? >>> >>> Is the correct name for whole specification >>> >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01 >>> >>> and for the three parts: >>> >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-part1 >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-part2 >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-part3 >>> >>> Could we also start with a cd05? That is: >>> >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05 >>> >>> for the whole specification, and for the three parts: >>> >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1 >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part2 >>> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part3 >>> >>> This may avoid confusion caused by the fact that we had already cd1 >>> specifications for the three individual parts. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering >>> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org >>> Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 >>> D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com >>> http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 >>> http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, >>> D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten >>> Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 >>> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >>> > > > -- > Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering > StarOffice/OpenOffice.org > Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 > D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com > http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 > http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, > D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten > Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]