RE: [oic] RE: SVN-Related Practices and Customs

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

I'm not thinking so far ahead concerning what the publishable product is.

For now, I don't think either the wiki or the SVN for SpecAnalysis are that.

I suspect that if there are versionable things, like tests and such, they
should not be down in the SpecAnalysis tree but might be linked from the
tree on the wiki.

My thinking doesn't go any farther than that until we have something more
concrete to chew on.

 - Dennis 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/200902/msg00091.html
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 02:09
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org; oic@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [oic] RE: SVN-Related Practices and Customs

[ ... ]


It seems to me that we should determine the "master" (authentic /
primary source, ...): will the review mainly be done using SVN, and
perhaps published on the Wiki ? Or the other way around ? Or forego the
Wiki altogether, and go straight from SVN to a report-document ?



Best regards,

Bart

[ ... ]