[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OIC-15) terms need to be moreconsistent

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OIC-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15672#action_15672 ] 

Dennis Hamilton commented on OIC-15:
------------------------------------

NEEDS-DISCUSSION

I agree.  We need to resolve this and be very consistent.  

I think this applies to the Application Scenario Tests also and I have added it to that component.

> terms need to be more consistent
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OIC-15
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OIC-15
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format Interoperability and Conformance (OIC) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ConformanceAssessmentMethod
>    Affects Versions: Working Draft
>            Reporter: Mingfei Jia
>            Assignee: Bart Hanssens
>
> Some terms should be consistent from current phase. Before I understand one test case include test scenario + test asssertion + test document. But in current proposal, these 3 things are separate, test cases only means the test scenario. That does not matter, only different understandings. But the terms need to be consistent. For example, the if we think test scenario is just test case, the folder name "scenario" in SVN should be changed to "Cases".

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira