OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

oic message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile"for Public Review


Mary,


Mm, that would be the State of Interop Report. Not the Interoperability Profile :-)

Regarding the Interoperability Profile, I'm still not sure if the required changes for
public review can be performed without a new draft + vote ? (numbering the
sections)

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201002/msg00048.html

Can you enlighten us here ? Thanks :-)


Best regards

Bart

________________________________________
From: Mary McRae [marypmcrae@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 7:38 PM
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: Hanssens Bart; oic@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile" for Public Review

Hi Dennis,

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201003/msg00009.html :)

Mary



On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

> Since we are talking about the Interoperability Profile, I wondered what is
> happening with the Public Review of CD02 that was approved on February 9?
>
> May we assume that a CD02 rev01 is being produced to deal with the changes
> requested by the TC Administrator, and that there will be a ballot to
> approve that as CD03 for Public Review?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be]
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201002/msg00048.html>
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 05:46
> To: Mary McRae; oic@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: tc-admin@oasis-open.org
> Subject: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile" for
> Public Review
>
> Hi Mary,
>
>
> thanks for reviewing this during the weekend !
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
>> Suggestion: number the sections in sequence. Following the title put the
> ODF1.1 number. You already
>> have the numbers in each clause which is fine.
>>
>> example: 3.1 Document Processing and Conformance (ODF1.1 Section 1.5)
>> 3.2 MIME Types and File Name Extensions (ODF1.1 Section 1.7)
>>
>> You could leave out the ODF1.1 since that's clearly stated.
>
> Ok, since that changes the content, not the converpages, I assume a re-vote
> is required ?
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Bart
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]