Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Test priority

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

2008/6/23  <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>:
>
> "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote on 06/23/2008 06:27:24 AM:
>
>> Is one test more 'important' (for reason X) than another?
>> If so, what type of reason is valid for such a prioritisation.
>>
>> E.g. is schema validity more important than other tests?
>>
>> Is this an issue for the TC?
>>
>> Would we want the charter to ask the TC to group tests
>> and provide a relative priority?
>>
>
> There may be little value (compared to effort) for doing this to all test
> cases.  But we might, in the "State of ODF Interoperability" reports
> highlight the "most important" test cases, perhaps the ones that are
> currently the source of significant interoperability problems.


How to phrase that as a deliverable?
To consider and provide, if applicable, relative priorities
to tests or groups of tests, one with another?

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk