Re: [orms] Minutes of the 2008-06-18 ORMS TC Telecon

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

It's correct in Kavi,

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Daniela Bourges Waldegg ---06/19/2008 02:52:44 AM---Just a correction - yesterday I wasn't in the call

From:	Daniela Bourges Waldegg <dbw@zurich.ibm.com>
To:	orms@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	06/19/2008 02:52 AM
Subject:	Re: [orms] Minutes of the 2008-06-18 ORMS TC Telecon

---

Just a correction - yesterday I wasn't in the call
Cheers
Daniela



On Jun 19, 2008, at 24:37 , Moortgat, Jean-Jacques wrote:

> Followning are the minutes of the 2008-06-18 ORMS TC telecon.
>
> Action items are prefixed with #.
> Date:  Wednesday, 18 June 2008
> Time:  05:00pm - 06:00pm ET
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1. Call to order
> - Verify Minute Taker
> - Roll Call
> 2. Status Report and Discussion on Terminology Glossary creation
> 3. Status Report and Discussion on Use Cases.
> 4. Discussion on the "Reputation Score"issue on the Charter
> -How to solve and settle down this?
> 5. Other Business
> -Is the 6/11 meeting counted as unofficial?
> -Modeling tools for use cases update
> 6. Adjournment
>
>
> MINUTES:
>
> 1. Call to order
> 2. Roll call:
>
> Attendance:
> JJ Moortgat
> William Barnhill
> Jeffrey Broberg
> Vadim Lander
> Drummond Reed
> Daniela Bourges Waldegg
> Robert Daly
> Michael McIntosh
> Anthony Nadalin
> Bruce Rich
> John Bradley
> Corey Leong
> Paul Trevithick
> Lauren Davis
> Les Chasen
> Peter Davis
> Jeff Hodges
> William Tan
> Dorothy Gellert
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nat Sakimura
> Tatsuki Sakushima
>
> 3. Verify minute taker:
> JJ Moortgat volunteered to take notes
>
> 4. Re-cap that last week's meeting, 6/11,  did not count.
>
> 5. Status Report and Discussion on Terminology Glossary creation
>
> Any additional comments on glossary creation?  It was discussed that
> it
> may be
> premature to create the glossary since we are still researching work.
> There are a few
> good glossaries out there, but we still need to research existing
> terminology and glossaries before creating our own.
>
> 6. Status Report and Discussion on Use Cases.
>
> Question was asked if there are any new use cases to throw on table.
> There were no new ones submitted this week.
>
> Question was asked on how we determine the validity or confidence of
> factual data vs. subjective data.  It was deemed that it may be out of
> scope to determine if factual data is valid or not, that instead, it
> may
> be part of the process an end-user would take when creating a
> Reputation
> formula.  If a formula variable was subjective, or if factual data was
> suspect, then a weight could be applied to that variable to take
> care of
> that.
>
> Question was asked if Daniella had submitted any more details on use
> cases, or if IBM had any additional use cases to bring to the table.
> The answer was that the use cases submitted at the face-to-face
> meeting
> (the presentation slides) is it for now.
>
> It was deemed that we are still in input mode for use cases and that
> we
> need to create more.
>
> There was a discussion on the conceptual level of use cases that we
> present as a committee.  A specific example was discussed where the
> Open
> ID use case may be too detailed and hard to understand for some, and
> that we need higher level use cases as well.
>
> 7. Discussion on the "Reputation Score"issue on the Charter
> -How to solve and settle down this?
>
> More debate over the score vs. value terminology in charter.  There
> was
> a discussion that if we were to define score vs. value in more detail,
> could the lawyers at the different organizations review the
> definitions
> and bless them, and would that be an acceptable approach.  There was
> some agreement on this.  The consensus was that we should leave the
> charter as is for now until we can review more use cases.  So, the
> decision was made to take the charter off the agenda for now, but to
> keep it as an "open issue" in the issue database.
>
> # Action Item is for Danialla to put the charter terminology
> clarification as an open action item.
>
> 8. Wrap up and the call was ended.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
> in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php