Re: [orms] Some more requirements

[Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>]

For that matter, would the empirical distribution more useful than the
enum on Normal, etc.?

=nat

(2010/03/09 16:34), Nat Sakimura wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Apart from what we have on the wiki at
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/orms/WorkingDraft, I generally think the
> followings are quite popular data point for the reputation purpose.
>
> * Peer Ranking
> * Number of Sample
> * Actual Data point and Comments
>
> Also, it would be quite useful to cluster those "scores" of different
> criteria in one file, e.g.,
>
> <Reputations>
> <Reputation></Reputation>
> <Reputation> </Reputation>
> ...
> </Reputations>
>
> In addition, it would be useful to have parent-child or Summary-Detail
> kind of relationship captured among the <Reputation>s.
>
> Also, another point of consideration:
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/orms/WorkingDraft has an ad-hoc reputation XML.
> Is it worth considering casting it to Atom or something?
>
>   


-- 
Nat Sakimura (n-sakimura@nri.co.jp)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. 
Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 Fax:+81-3-6274-1547