SV: Alternative representation of Parts List

[Gyllström Leif <leif.gyllstrom@aerotechtelub.se>]

All

Appologies !!   I ment to send a zipped file !

Regards 

Leif

>  -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: 	Gyllström Leif  
> Skickat:	den 7 mars 2005 13:13
> Till:	'plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Ämne:	Alternative representation of Parts List 
> 
> Hi
> 
> At the Lillehammer meeting we had a lot of discussions regarding Parts List, and whether it
> should be a separate DEX, or a capability, or .... However, I think we concluded on that.
> 
> However, I still think there is a practical issue that we have to resolve and that is HOW
> a Parts List should be represented in a data exchange based the PLCS data model. 
> My concern does not just adress the Parts List issue, but practically any other exchange
> of documented results such as a FMECA analysis report, a Maintenance plan etc etc.
> 
> In the attached document I've provided four different approaches on HOW a documented
> result (e.g. Parts List) could be represented in a data exchange. (And there might be more)
> 
> I think we have to conclude on one approach which will be generic enough to cater
> for any type of documented result.
> 
> Any thoughts ?? 
> 
> It might even be a combination of the four approached that would be the best solution
> such as a combination of #1 and #4.
> 
> Regrads
> 
> Leif Gyllström
> 
> 
>  <<Fil: Four alternatives for Part List representation.doc>> 
> 
> 
> 
>