[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: [plcs-dex] Classification of type and individual
Rob
I
would suggest that we only classify the typical due to the implications that the
other approach will have on the reference data library.
We
have agreed that refdata should be regarded as specializations (subclasses) of
PLCS Entities. This would mean that an instance of
reference data would have to be defined for both the
typical and the actual thing. Yes, OWL will allow for a class being a subclass
of
several Entity classes. But I'm convinced that this
will cause confusion and classes for typical will only appear as specializations
of
the
entity representing the actual etc.
I'm
stongly in favor of keeping the separation of typical and actual,and exchange
both instances, and have a consistent approach
throughout PLCS.
Regards
Leif
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]