OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

plcs-dex message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] Issue RBN-1 dexlib/data/templates/representing_product_as_realized


A reply issued, as follows:

 

  <comment by="Peter Bergstr&ouml;m" date="2007-08-15">

    <description>

      This template do not use the Part_version, only indirectly through the use of template representing_part, which includes a version.

      All values of the Part_version is set automatically in the path, therefore the "unknown" version.

      I see two alternative solutions to this, if you are not satisfied with the current solution:

      <ol>

        <li>

          replace the use of template representing_part with a simple instantioation of a single entity Part.

        <br/>

          My arguments against this is that we don't get the Product_category instantiated, and if there is a template for representing a Part, why shouldn't we use it?

        </li>

        <li>

          Omit the representation of Part all together in this template (as suggested as a solution for issue DNV-28a)

          <br/>

          I'm not fond of this solution either, since I believe the "type ID" (the Part) is part of the identifier of a Product_as_individual.

        </li>

      </ol>

    </description>

  </comment>

 

Peter

 


From: Rob Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent: den 7 augusti 2007 17:20
To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [plcs-dex] Issue RBN-1 dexlib/data/templates/representing_product_as_realized

 

I have reopened issue RBN-1 with this comment

 

 

This template uses representing_part and defaults the part verison to unknown.

It is not clear why we need to mention the part_version at all in this

template.

The relationship is between the product_as_individual and the part. The

relationship between the Part_version and the product_as_realised is not in

scope.

Having an unknown version when we do not need to refer to the version is confusing.

We should either create a referencing_part template and use that or

instantiate a part and relate to that.

 

Regards
Rob

-------------------------------------------   
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Tel: +44 (0)1452 810 960
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Web:
http://www.eurostep.com


Eurostep Limited. Registered in England and Wales No.03049099

Registered Office: Cwttir Lane, St. Asaph, Denbighshire LL17 0LQ.

 

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]