[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [plcs] Committee Specification Approval Ballot Request for Product Life Cycle Support DEXs Version R5
|
Mary, Haven’t seen anything on the Committee
Specification Approval Ballot for PLCS DEX Version R5. Can you tell me what is
the current status? Thanks Chris Kreiler From: Mary McRae
[mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Whew! OK, thanks. You should have indicated yes on the form for revised
document; that would have automatically brought up additional questions and
would trigger the spec review. Would you mind resubmitting the form? Thanks! Mary
On Sep 14, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Kreiler, Christopher G wrote:
Mary, I am not saying that what we are
submitting includes the aviation DEX. What we are submitting is what went out
for the 15 day comment period with editorial changes. I am saying that the version (R4) that was
out for the 15 day review did not have any comments during the period.
Comments were submitted by one member after the 15-day review period had
closed. These were minor comments and the committee passed a motion to
forward the PLCS DEX Version R5 to OASIS for a Committee Specification Ballot
when the minor changes had been addressed in R4. Below is an excerpt from the meeting
minutes that covers what I said. 3. Comments received from OASIS Public Review
period v Discussed comments submitted by Eurostep and response by
LSC for correction. Seeoasis_r4_issues_eurostep.docx and oasis_r4_issues_eurostep_anm_response.docx v Solution is to add missing template, remove disjoint rules
and remove 2 OWL classes. v Changes considered to be editorial in nature v Revised document available in a couple of days. 4. Launch of ballot on Task DEX as a Committee
Specification v No substantive changes are required for comment resolution. MOTION: The PLCS TC
resolves to forward the revised TASK DEX document to OASIS for a vote as a
Committee Specification. v Motion to forward Task DEX as a Committee Specification
approved by unanimous consent Action item 53/1:
Secretariat to submit corrected Task DEX document to OASIS Mary McRae for a
committee specification vote (Chris Kreiler) Thanks Chris Kreiler From: Mary McRae
[mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Hi Chris, I think what you're saying is that it is not the same
version that was sent for 15-day public review. In that case you must provide a
new version which must be approved as a CD, and agree that no substantive
changes were made. I hope what you're not saying is that what you're submitting
for CS approval includes the aviation DEX? Mary On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Kreiler, Christopher G <Chris.Kreiler@mantech.com> wrote: Mary, I just want to clarify the statement “Were
Comments Received during the Public Review(s) - no” There were lots of
comments (300+) during first 60-day public review that were worked. It
was decided to reduce the content so we removed the “Aviation DEX” and
proceeded with just the “Task DEX” for an additional 15-day public review. During the 15 day review period, no
comments were submitted. After the review period closed, one of our
members submitted some minor comments which the committee felt should be
address prior to proceeding to a Committee Specification vote. What is being submitted is R5 which
includes the changes we made as a result of the minor comments. The
minutes show that was the plan and the committee voted to submit the document
for a Committee Specification vote. We have also submitted a summary of
changes. Please call or e-mail if you have any
questions that need to be address. Thanks Chris Kreiler From: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] The following request was
submitted to the OASIS TC Administrator on 13/09/2010:
OASIS TC Administrator Member Section Administrator OASIS: Advancing open standards for the
information society | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]