[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Groups - PLCS Face-toFace Meeting 57 modified
PLCS Face-toFace Meeting 57 has been modified by Mr. Christopher Kreiler Date: Tuesday, 15 March 2011 Time: 08:00am - 05:00pm ET Event Description: Meeting will be held at the South Carolina Research Authority (SCRA)Facilities in conjunction with the PLCS Implementers Workshop. Address of SCRA is: 5300 International Boulevard Charleston, SC 29418 Meeting 57 Face-to-Face 15 March 2011 0900-1600 US EDT, starting 1400 CET, 1300 UK, 1300 GMT, and 0600 US PDT *** Please note time of meeting US will have transferred to Daylight Saving Time*** The face-to-face meeting will be held in conjunction with the PLCS Implementers Workshop scheduled for 16-18 March. The agenda for the workshop will be published separately by the event sponsors. Dial-in numbers & passcodes for those unable to attend in person PARTICIPANTS PIN NUMBER: 499596 # Country Number France 0805 110 496 Germany 0800 101 4935 Italy 800 985 528 Norway 21033439 Sweden 0200 895 376 USA +1 866 874 0924 UK 01452 542 437 Std Int Dial In +44 (0) 1452 542 437 v Objective The primary objective of this session is to focus on the definition of the Implementers Forum. Progress against existing actions will also be reviewed. Agenda: 1. Welcome by Chair 2. Roll call Members are invited to highlight any news of relevance to the TC 3. Publication of Task DEX as a Committee Specification Action item 55/1: Check with Robin Cover (OASIS) to see if TC needs to do anything to get it published (Secretariat) completed Action item 53/3: Secretariat to resource spreadsheet against work getting Task DEX out (Chris Kreiler / Colin Tweedie) Lessons learned Budgetary requirements 4. AP 239 e2 status (Rob Bodington) 5. Workstreams (Chair) o Process development (TOG) Recommendations from TOG based on lessons learned from Task DEX and earlier project. Action item 46/1: Provide Tor Arne with any inputs to expand the PLCS Activity Model (All) Action item 52/3: Explore potential dates for TOG/CORE Team face-to-face meeting (Tor Arne Irgens) Action item 54/1: Members to forward AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, inputs, issues, and observations to TOG (All) Action item 54/2: Post inputs for AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, issues, and observations to TOG (Chris Kreiler, Tor Arne Irgens) Action item 41/4: Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment (Mats Nilsson) Improved DEX development process o Further DEX standardisation (All) Members are invited to present information on any new DEX developments they are undertaking, (Standing Action item 37/5) Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website (Standing Action item 33/2) Secretariat to post a quick summary of the "Further DEX standardisation on PLCS website upon receipt of information from PLCS TC members (Standing Action item 53/2) Action item 41/2: Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com (All) o Web services Release of EPM PLCS Web services Action item 27/4: Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS (Howard Mason, Rob Bodington, and Nigel Shaw) Action item 27/5: Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services (All) Action item 27/6: Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services (Chair, Rob Bodington) Action item 42/2: Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services (Nigel Shaw) o Resources Action item 46/2: Provide inputs and estimates for the resource spreadsheet including resolution of ballot comments, additional one-off costs, development of reference data, capabilities, and templates, and any additional items for completion of core Tasks (CORE Team) Action item 47/1: Finish TC core activities with time and costs spreadsheet to include DEX development costs (Chris Kreiler / Rob Bodington) 6. Requirements for Implementers Forum (Jim Colson/Scot Motquin) Action item 50/1: Flag issues and requirements for implementers' forum. Send to Jim Colson (All) Action item 50/2: Estimate of costs and business model on how this will be self-sustaining (Jim Colson and TOG) Action item 55/2: Report back on Implementers Forum set-up costs and sustainment costs (Phil Rosche) Action item 55/3: Develop requirements package (Scot Motquin, Tor Arne Irgens, Howard Mason, Allison Barnard Feeney) Action item 56/1: Set up SourceForge wiki to include collaboration on requirements (Rob Bodington/Josh Lubell) 7. Liaisons Other OASIS TCs o Codelist (Nigel Shaw) Action 26/1: Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements (Nigel Shaw) www.et.gov Action 19/8 & 22/12: Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov. (Nigel Shaw) ASD (Carl Wilen/Howard Mason) POSC/CAESAR (Nils Sandsmark) GEIA (Jim Colson) Life Cycle Information Management AC/327 (Tor Arne Irgens) MoU between PLCS, SCORM, and S1000D 8. Promotional opportunities Standing Action item 42/4: Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website. (All) 9. OASIS Administration Action 15/20: Chair (Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done 10. Future meeting schedule, hosts 11. Any Other Business 12. Standing Action Items Meeting Date and Number Action Item # Action Item Responsibility Closed 30 Aug 2007 33 2 Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website All STANDING ACTION 11 Mar 2008 37 5 Document DEX development proposals All STANDING ACTION 15 Dec 2008 42 4 Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website. All STANDING ACTION 8 Sep 2010 53 2 Secretariat to post a quick summary of the "Further DEX standardisation on PLCS website upon receipt of information from PLCS TC members All STANDING ACTION 13. Open Action Items Meeting Date and Number Action Item # Action Item Responsibility Closed 14 Apr 2005 15 20 Chair(Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done Howard Mason OPEN 29 Sep 2005 19 8 Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and given the changing state of P28e2, provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov. Nigel Shaw OPEN 10 Jan 2006 22 12 Recheck to see if posting material and a link to the PLCS ePortal would be beneficial Nigel Shaw OPEN 7 Sep 2006 26 1 Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements Nigel Shaw OPEN 31 Oct 2006 27 4 Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS Howard Mason Rob Bodington Nigel Shaw OPEN 31 Oct 2006 27 5 Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services All OPEN 31 Oct 2006 27 6 Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services Howard Mason Rob Bodington OPEN 23 Oct 2008 41 2 Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com All OPEN 23 Oct 2008 41 4 Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment Mats Nilsson OPEN 15 Dec 2008 42 2 Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services Nigel Shaw OPEN 6 Apr 2009 44 1 TOG to list competencies for TOG membership TOG OPEN 18 Sep 2009 46 1 Provide Tor Arne with any inputs to expand the PLCS Activity Model All OPEN 20 Oct 2009 47 1 Finish TC core activities with time and costs spreadsheet to include DEX development costs Chris Kreiler Rob Bodington OPEN 25 Feb 2010 50 1 Flag issues and requirements for implementers' forum. Send to Jim Colson All OPEN 25 Feb 2010 50 2 Estimate of costs and business model on how this will be self-sustaining Jim Colson and TOG OPEN 13 Apr 2010 52 3 Explore potential dates for TOG/CORE Team face-to-face meeting Tor Arne Irgens OPEN 8 Sep 2010 53 3 Secretariat to resource spreadsheet against work getting TASK DEX out Chris Kreiler / Colin Tweedie OPEN 2 Nov 2010 54 1 Members to forward AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, inputs, issues, and observations to TOG All OPEN 2 Nov 2010 54 2 Post inputs for AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, inputs, issues, and observations to TOG Chris Kreiler Tor Arne Irgens OPEN 2 Dec 2010 55 1 Check with Mary McCrae (OASIS) to see if TC needs to do anything to get it published Secretariat OPEN 2 Dec 2010 55 2 Report back on Implementers Forum set-up costs and sustainment costs Phil Rosche OPEN 2 Dec 2010 55 3 Develop requirements package Scott Motquin, Tor Arne Irgens, Howard Mason, Allison Barnard Feeney OPEN 13 Jan 2011 56 1 Set up Source Forge wiki to include collaboration on requirements Rob Bodington Minutes: Objective The primary objectives of this session were to focus future development activities, prepare a forward plan and prepare TC input to the Implementors Forum workshop. 1. Welcome by Chair Chair welcomed everyone to the first Face-to-Face meeting for two years, during which the first DEX had passed through to adoption as an OASIS Technical Specification, and the TC had learned a number of lessons about the process Noted development of AP242, and its emphasis on the creation of a Business Object Model Technologies for standards development, implementation and testing had advanced Number of new DEXs including new Item Identification DEX submitted from DNV Implementors Forum now under active preparation Key challenges is to bring all the strands together into a systematic approach to develop, implement and test DEXes, balancing the need for innovation with the handling of legacy information. 2. Roll call Members are invited to highlight any news of relevance to the TC See Attendance_plcs_Mtg57_2011-03-15.xls The meeting did achieve a quorum Meeting Statistics Quorum rule 51% of voting members Achieved quorum true Counts toward voter eligibility true Individual Attendance Members: 20 of 97 (20%) Voting Members: 10 of 16 (62%) (used for quorum calculation) Company Attendance Companies: 13 of 25 (52%) Voting Companies: 10 of 12 (83%) Meeting Attendees Name Company Status Howard Mason BAE SYSTEMS plc Group Member Trine Hansen Det Norske Veritas (DNV)* Group Member Rob Bodington Eurostep AB* Group Member Nigel Shaw Eurostep AB* Group Member Phil Spiby Eurostep AB* Group Member Kjell Bengtsson Jotne EPM Technology* Group Member Jochen Haenisch Jotne EPM Technology* Group Member James Martin Jotne EPM Technology* Group Member Pamela Rooney Lockheed Martin* Group Member James Nyambayo LSC Group Ltd* Group Member Christopher Kreiler ManTech Enterprise Integration Center (e-IC)* Group Member Allison Barnard Feeney NIST* Group Member Joshua Lubell NIST* Group Member KC Morris NIST* Group Member Tor Arne Irgens Norwegian Defence Logistics Organization* Group Member Leif Gyllstrom Saab AB Group Member Mats Elgh Swedish Defence Materiel Administration* Group Member Phil Rutland UK Ministry of Defence Technical Information* Group Member Jonathan Mayes USAMC Logistics Support Activity* Group Member Scot Motquin USAMC Logistics Support Activity* Group Member Joel Battistoni --- Guest Sylvere Krima NIST Guest 3. Publication of Task DEX as a Committee Specification Action item 55/1: Check with Robin Cover (OASIS) to see if TC needs to do anything to get it published (Secretariat) completed Action item 53/3: Secretariat to resource spreadsheet against work getting Task DEX out (Chris Kreiler / Colin Tweedie) Lessons learned Budgetary requirements Main issue was delay in OASIS Comments received from Robin Cover (OASIS) acted upon and Task DEX published as an OASIS Specification Next step is move to OASIS Standard. Need 3 Statements of use. None as yet. UKMOD plans to implement when funding available. Saab implemented a draft version with JOTNE/EPM, not in use. It was questioned whether all the changes required by OASIS had been incorporated in the publication scripts, which would be required for the next DEX. James Nyambayo (LSC Group) will check with Ann Meads and Colin Tweedie Taking Task DEX forward to OASIS standards requires 15% of OASIS member approving. May be the acid test of whether moving to OASIS was a wise move. Action item 57/1: Check with Ann Meads and Colin Tweedie if all of Robin Cover's comments on the Task DEX were incorporated in the scripts (James Nyambayo) 4. AP 239 e2 status (Rob Bodington) CR5 containing the necessary modules has been balloted. Still with Convener awaiting corrections that must be made prior to submission to ISO (note subsequent to meeting: completed 16 March) AP 239 ed2 with SC 4/WG 3 convener Need CR5 to be published as SMRL v5 before AP 239 ed2 can be published Action item 57/2: Check with SC 4/WG 3 convener to see what is the hold up for CR5 (Howard Mason) - completed 5. Workstreams (Chair) o Process development (TOG) Recommendations from TOG based on lessons learned from Task DEX and earlier project. Action item 46/1: Provide Tor Arne with any inputs to expand the PLCS Activity Model (All) convert to standing action Action item 52/3: Explore potential dates for TOG/CORE Team face-to-face meeting (Tor Arne Irgens) Action item 54/1: Members to forward AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, inputs, issues, and observations to TOG (All) Action item 54/2: Post inputs for AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, issues, and observations to TOG (Chris Kreiler, Tor Arne Irgens) Action item 41/4: Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment (Mats Nilsson) (Cancelled absorbed into Reference Data Program) Improved DEX development process Tor Arne commented on making the Activity Model more detailed. Used it to look at configuration scenarios. However, it was difficult to navigate because of IDEF0 modelling o Have seen benefit of using it in support of NATO CM scenario, presented at NATO CM symposium. Found shortfalls in scenario, rather than in the Activity Model. o Working through the activity model is not easy, you have to understand it and know IDEF0 modelling. Tor Arne planning to make a travellers guide for moving from one box to another. o Proposes enhancing the AAM, increasing level of detail. Question, though, is that expanding the scope? Should it be left as it is? Tor Arne in favor of detailing further. Would be easier to understand where DEXs are, if the detail in the AAM was higher. o Question of changing to different notation, process v. activity as well as level of detail. Nigel Shaw comment: As you get deeper and deeper into IDF0 detail, you end up with a list of sequential activities, or more of a process model. The model gets more and more difficult to navigate. It is difficult to find a viable alternative. Would take quite a lot of work to convert IDEF0 to another notation. Phil Spiby comment: Once you get down to a DEX, you can get deeper into the details with out running into the complexity that you have dealing with the whole scope. Will require more thought. o Leave as standing action, Tor Arne will provide input to the TOG. Presentation of "PLCS Widening the take up" briefed by Rob Bodington o Improved DEX development process o Developed by UK Defense Equipment and Support. NDLO, DNV, Eurostep, Boeing. o Project set up to make PLCS easier to understand o PLCS Web Services paper developed by Eurostep and Boeing o DEXLib2 works from AP239 ed2 o Need classification and identification o Should use SysML approach o Need Business-focused Web Services at higher level AP242 open to considering SysML approach. Unfortunate that schedule clock has been ticking while DEXLib2 was still under wraps AP242 plans to have a business object model within the standard AP203 ed2 changed Bill of Materials (BOM) to match AP214 Could PLCS approach be used for AP242, STEP APs in general? AP203 changed bill of material (product_occurrence) explicit as item or implicit as relationship. That is one sticking point in bringing the two together. Approach can be adopted into developing SC 4 STEP modules Equally applicable to AP 233 and AP239. Embracing use of reference data PLCS discussion would like to have metrics on performance differences between DEXlib 1 and 2. Could Rob forward metrics? o COTS tools, SysML provides type checking, type safe o Quick to build templates and DEXs o File size reduced by 1/3 using PSM JOTNE EPM web services doing the same sorts of things. Also similar work in 242 BOM team. Would be good to compare the transformation simplifications. Would need to rework older DEXs to publish as a block within OASIS There is a transition requirement even if you dont accept DEXlib2, since you will have to update to AP239 ed2. Efficient to make both changes at once. How will it affect the implementers forum and tools or technology used in the forum? Tools which implement the templates and 239 would need to be modified to dexlib2 Right now our legacy is the DEX (1 at standard level) and templates that support. Not a significant number of implementations. Software out there, implementers can still code generate off of the express as before. LOGSA has a contract to have an adaptor created in the old style. Are there plans to handle ed1 v ed2? Can carry on business as usual with edition 1. Is there a mapping from ed1 to ed2 - it is documented but not done. Files from ed1 would not be readable or writable by edition 2 unless extra work is done implementing a mapping Number of tools have implemented SysML Can still use EXPRESS if already modelling and is checkable Part 28 has been implemented differently in many systems. PLCS defines how it should be implemented. May be a problem with different vendor implementations, one of the drivers for the forum For the forum, original intent was exchange of p28 files not web services XML Schema to represent PSM generated automatically. SysML is appropriate for web services. But still need XML for exchange. Initial reaction is to go ahead with a pilot to prove concept and make sure it meets the need Item Identification DEX ready to go the old way. Do we wish to continue or do we wish to make it the pilot? It could be the first pilot of a transition, as it is complete. New approach would reduce documentation time 50% User side, would help the systems involved better understand the process as well Transition from DEXLib1 to DEXLib2 requires o PSM review and agreement o Go through templates within PLCS o Create templates you need o Then go back into DEXs and replace templates o Establish reference data o Then publish Nigel Shaws transition thoughts. o Core PLCS templates, startup cost. Still some work to be done. Also work to be done on DEXLib 2. Work in progress still, not completed. o What do I start testing on, current file format is what people are using o Then bring in new file format o Then bring in DEXs based on SysML o Then makes sense to bring in services It was agreed that we were not yet at the point where we can use the new process. Close to that point, need to review and agree on PSM. Implement the templates on top of it. If a template takes an hour, we have 80, we only need half of them, so 40 hours. Scot noted that if the new way creates an .xsd file, would be a lot easier to test, verify, validate, certify than P28 o XML schema for validation o Validate reference data being used and used correctly, independent of PSM or 239 o Ensure that the files that you exchange conform to the templates o The data that is instantiated is conformant with the template o The XSD file can be validated with generic tools. P28 also is XSD. Lockheed Martin looked down supply chain, 1000 at random, average size of company 20 people. How do we make PLCS work for those companies? The TOG was actioned to review the SysML/PSM proposal with the Core Team before the SC 4 meeting in Portland,Oregon, starting 22 May. Tor Arne proposed to respond later this week with a more accurate schedule. All voting members at the table are here for the rest of the week so TC can be reconvened if necessary for any decision. Liaison organisations such as SC 4, AIA, ASD and NATO would need to be briefed on any change of methodology. Action item 57/3: TOG to review DEXlib2 proposal with Core Team before May 22 (Tor Arne Irgens) JOTNE EPM also created handbook for developing DEXs - PLCS Handbook for Development Data Exchange Software_Draft_vn1.3.1.pdf o Further DEX standardisation (All) Members are invited to present information on any new DEX developments they are undertaking, (Standing Action item 37/5) Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website (Standing Action item 33/2) Secretariat to post a quick summary of the "Further DEX standardisation on PLCS website upon receipt of information from PLCS TC members (Standing Action item 53/2) Action item 41/2: Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com (All) DNV submitted Item Identification DEX for consideration. Documented according to version 1 and ready for ballot. Debated documenting in ed2, but decided against since not public. After some debate, it was agreed to review this further before deciding how to proceed to publication. It was agreed that configuration control through the standards process probably meant that the DEXes should be treated individually within that process. DEX 8 Product as Individual had never been completed, and it was questioned whether Item Identification, could be replaced with this one? LOGSAs work with S2000M only doing chapter one, not looking at messaging chapters Does LOGSA still anticipate 7 DEXs, have 9 in mind. Core is product breakdown for support, all depend on that one. If you have a piece of equipment you can have a facility for it, etc. Nigel Shaw commented that the design intent on edges of PLCS is to manage complexity by allowing things to be brought in by files - can map into PLCS or carry on document paradigm and attach a document. New DEXs under GEIA-0007 sponsored by LOGSA PLCS needs to expose DEX that related to ASD and AIA work PLCS model was designed broadly to accommodate legacy systems Airbus TDP DEX still on-going. Membership had lapsed but re-registering under their parent company EADS. Nicholas Figay heading project. o Web services Release of EPM PLCS Web services Action item 27/4: Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS (Howard Mason, Rob Bodington, and Nigel Shaw) Action item 27/5: Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services (All) Action item 27/6: Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services (Chair, Rob Bodington) Action item 42/2: Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services (Nigel Shaw) PLCS Web Services paper developed by Eurostep and Boeing Action item 42/2 cancelled. Eurostep and Boeing paper satisfies action item Do we still need to talk to the OASIS web services TC? Open Recommendations on level of granularity, publication method for web services. There is still discussion that needs to be had on this area. Eurostep had put forward a methodology in the Boeing report. o Resources Action item 46/2: Provide inputs and estimates for the resource spreadsheet including resolution of ballot comments, additional one-off costs, development of reference data, capabilities, and templates, and any additional items for completion of core Tasks (CORE Team) Action item 47/1: Finish TC core activities with time and costs spreadsheet to include DEX development costs (Chris Kreiler / Rob Bodington) DEXLib has been provided free of charge by Eurostep Need to investigate how to sustain it DEXLib2 developed to be more easily maintained, better documented, and more consistent Planning for future activity will need to include: Core development and sustainment Individual DEX development projects DEX coordination Implementors Forum 6. Requirements for Implementers Forum (Jim Colson/Scot Motquin) Action item 50/1: Flag issues and requirements for implementers' forum. Send to Jim Colson (All) Action item 50/2: Estimate of costs and business model on how this will be self-sustaining (Jim Colson and TOG) Action item 55/2: Report back on Implementers Forum set-up costs and sustainment costs (Phil Rosche) Action item 55/3: Develop requirements package (Scot Motquin, Tor Arne Irgens, Howard Mason, Allison Barnard Feeney) Action item 56/1: Set up SourceForge wiki to include collaboration on requirements (Rob Bodington/Josh Lubell) Chair reviewed requirements received at the last meeting (Meeting 56) from the minutes What is content of package submitted for testing, i.e. use cases, test data, usage guides, etc.? Need to do stakeholder mapping to implementers forum to identify who cares? Should forum consider doing certification? Probably not. Look at Framework on quality and testing for the TC document created by Nigel Shaw, Tor Arne Irgens, and Trine Hansen early in the PLCS program - Testing_framework_01-002_JSV_16dfeb2004.doc. Based on TOG, Implementers forum, Quality group. Could we look at that again? On the OASIS website from 2005, in Quality folder. Based on assumption that the TC owns the implementers forum Trine would like to ask whether we should put the Quality group in place. Goals for IF - Be productive, list and prioritize requirements. Crawl, walk, run theory/ 7. Liaisons Other OASIS TCs o Codelist (Nigel Shaw) Action 26/1: Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements (Nigel Shaw) No report www.et.gov Action 19/8 & 22/12: Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov. (Nigel Shaw) No report ASD (Carl Wilen/Howard Mason) Decision for each spec to be supported by a Data Exchange Specification S1000D contains 2 DEXs. Product ID and Task S2000M will not get into business transactions. Looking at data elements for provisioning and business S5000 "Feedback" not yet started. Will be supported by PLCS DEXs Forming Data Modelling and exchange group responsible for harmonization Strategic Standardisation Group supporting a number of projects, LOTAR, ILS Specs, etc. Chair (Howard Mason) has presentation if anyone is interested Aerospace industry re-engaging in development activities AIA reviewed some of these standards and have signed an MoU to collaborate on development. POSC/CAESAR (Nils Sandsmark) POCS/CAESAR working on ISO 15926 series and interested in joint work on reference data TechAmerica (formerly GEIA) (Jim Colson) Provisioning handbook. How to take a system, provision it, what tools are available. Trying to complete by October 2011. Start ballot. Contains other common LSAR reports such as bill of materials, maintenance allocation, etc. Another handbook for reports. LOGSA also working with subcontractor to implement GEIA-STD-927. It was noted that the 927 schema, brought together a number of different drafts, including the early PAS 20542 for Systems engineering and the DIS AP 239 into a composite schema. If the latest effort did not work, it was considered that 927 is going to die. Tor Arne could talk to Jim. Finalizing Product Support DEX and others Life Cycle Information Management AC/327 (Tor Arne Irgens) Addressing update in acquisition Reviewing STANAGS to ensure they are current and relevant Looking to expand item identification DEX to include maintenance history and share information across countries MoU between PLCS, SCORM, and S1000D Still alive. Industry still interested What should we be feeding back to groups involved in DEX development? Action item 57/4: Check with Chair of ISO/TC 22/SC 15 Road vehicles/ Interchangeability of components of commercial vehicles and buses (Howard Mason) Other Groups Anyone interested in sending PLCS information securely? Transglobal Secure Communication Program (TSCP.org) working to protecting sensitive information, covering national security, export control and proprietary constraints. 8. Promotional opportunities Standing Action item 42/4: Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website. (All) 2011-04-13/14 UK Defence IT 2011-05-24/26 ADL Conference in Norway 2011-06-07/09 Semantic Days, Oslo, Norway 2011-09-19/23 National Aerospace Week in U.S. leadership Forum planned at AIA 9. OASIS Administration Action 15/20: Chair (Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done 10. Future meeting schedule, hosts Follow-up Meeting 58 planned for 2011-03-18 to report on progress of workshop 11. Any Other Business None 12. Standing Action Items Meeting Date and Number Action Item # Action Item Responsibility Closed 30 Aug 2007 33 2 Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website All STANDING ACTION 11 Mar 2008 37 5 Document DEX development proposals All STANDING ACTION 15 Dec 2008 42 4 Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website. All STANDING ACTION 18 Sep 2009 46 1 Provide Tor Arne with any inputs to expand the PLCS Activity Model All OPEN 8 Sep 2010 53 2 Secretariat to post a quick summary of the "Further DEX standardisation on PLCS website upon receipt of information from PLCS TC members All STANDING ACTION 13. Open Action Items Meeting Date and Number Action Item # Action Item Responsibility Closed 14 Apr 2005 15 20 Chair(Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done Howard Mason OPEN 29 Sep 2005 19 8 Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and given the changing state of P28e2, provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov. Nigel Shaw OPEN 10 Jan 2006 22 12 Recheck to see if posting material and a link to the PLCS ePortal would be beneficial Nigel Shaw OPEN 7 Sep 2006 26 1 Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements Nigel Shaw OPEN 31 Oct 2006 27 4 Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS Howard Mason Rob Bodington Nigel Shaw OPEN 31 Oct 2006 27 5 Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services All OPEN 31 Oct 2006 27 6 Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services Howard Mason Rob Bodington OPEN 23 Oct 2008 41 2 Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com All OPEN 23 Oct 2008 41 4 Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment Mats Nilsson Cancelled. Absorbed into Reference Data program 20 Oct 2009 47 1 Finish TC core activities with time and costs spreadsheet to include DEX development costs Chris Kreiler Rob Bodington OPEN 25 Feb 2010 50 1 Flag issues and requirements for implementers' forum. Send to Jim Colson All OPEN 25 Feb 2010 50 2 Estimate of costs and business model on how this will be self-sustaining Jim Colson and TOG OPEN 13 Apr 2010 52 3 Explore potential dates for TOG/CORE Team face-to-face meeting Tor Arne Irgens OPEN 8 Sep 2010 53 3 Secretariat to resource spreadsheet against work getting TASK DEX out Chris Kreiler / Colin Tweedie OPEN 2 Nov 2010 54 1 Members to forward AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, inputs, issues, and observations to TOG All OPEN 2 Nov 2010 54 2 Post inputs for AP239 edition 1 and edition 2 concerns, inputs, issues, and observations to TOG Chris Kreiler Tor Arne Irgens OPEN 2 Dec 2010 55 1 Check with Mary McCrae (OASIS) to see if TC needs to do anything to get it published Secretariat Closed 2 Dec 2010 55 2 Report back on Implementers Forum set-up costs and sustainment costs Phil Rosche OPEN 2 Dec 2010 55 3 Develop requirements package Scott Motquin, Tor Arne Irgens, Howard Mason, Allison Barnard Feeney OPEN 13 Jan 2011 56 1 Set up Source Forge wiki to include collaboration on requirements Rob Bodington 15 Mar 2011 57 1 Check with Ann Meads and Colin Tweedie if all of Robin Cover's comments on the Task DEX were incorporated James Nyambayo 15 Mar 2011 57 2 Check with SC4 WG3 convener to see what is the hold up for CR5 Howard Mason Completed 15 Mar 2011 57 3 TOG to review DEXlib2 proposal with Core Team before May 22 Tor Arne Irgens 15 Mar 2011 57 4 Check with Chair of ISO/TC 22/SC 15 Road vehicles/ Interchangeability of components of commercial vehicles and buses Howard Mason View event details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/event.php?event_id=29892 PLEASE NOTE: If the above link does not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. Referenced Items Date Name Type ---- ---- ---- 2011-03-08 Agenda_Meeting_57_20110315_Rev1.docAgenda 2011-03-18 Minutes_Meeting_57_20110315_Rev1.docMinutes
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:PUBLISH VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Kavi Corporation//NONSGML Kavi Groups//EN X-WR-CALNAME:My Calendar BEGIN:VEVENT CATEGORIES:MEETING STATUS:TENTATIVE DTSTAMP:20110318T000000Z DTSTART:20110315T120000Z DTEND:20110315T210000Z SEQUENCE:6 SUMMARY:PLCS Face-toFace Meeting 57 DESCRIPTION:Meeting will be held at the South Carolina Research Authority (SCRA)Facilities in conjunction with the PLCS Implementers Workshop. Address of SCRA is:\n\n5300 International Boulevard\nCharleston\, SC 29418\n \n\nMeeting 57 Face-to-Face 15 March 2011 0900-1600 US EDT\, starting 1400 CET\, 1300 UK\, 1300 GMT\, and 0600 US PDT \n\n*** Please note time of meeting US will have transferred to Daylight Saving Time***\n\nThe face-to-face meeting will be held in conjunction with the PLCS Implementers Workshop scheduled for 16-18 March. The agenda for the workshop will be published separately by the event sponsors.\n\nDial-in numbers & passcodes for those unable to attend in person\n\nPARTICIPANTS PIN NUMBER: 499596 #\n\n Country Number\nFrance 0805 110 496\nGermany 0800 101 4935\nItaly 800 985 528\nNorway 21033439\nSweden 0200 895 376\nUSA +1 866 874 0924\nUK 01452 542 437\nStd Int Dial In +44 (0) 1452 542 437\nv\nObjective\n\nThe primary objective of this session is to focus on the definition of the Implementers Forum. Progress against existing actions will also be reviewed.\n\nGroup: OASIS Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) TC\nCreator: Mr. Christopher Kreiler URL:http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/event.php?event_id=29892 UID:http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/event.php?event_id=29892 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]