RE: [regrep-cc-review] [LAST CALL!!!] Re: [regrep-cc-review] Moving Forward (RIM-based vs. XML Serialization)

[David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Joe,

Obviously I'm NOT in 100% agreement with this approach.

I'm OK with it - upto the last sentence.  Why handcuff ourselves?

I think we can defer a decision on the last piece until we get
into the implementation details and discover what is really
needed.  At this point we're just making an educated guess
as to what might be the ultimate outcome here.  No sense
in excluding options that we are not certain over.

So I would ask that the last sentence be simply deleted 
for now.

Thanks, DW.
=======================================================
Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph"
>I think we're at the point where our majority favors a RIM-based
approach: That is, mapping to RIM where possible, and - where not
possible - either use Slots, or recommend updates to the RIM as
required. This means that we would *not* be defining an XML
serialization for Core Components in *any way*, and will leave that up
to other initiatives/groups.

Please reply to this e-mail (on the listserv) only if you are *not* in
100% agreement with what is stated above. Otherwise, we will move
forward with this approach.
<