[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Moving Forward (RIM-based vs.XMLSerialization)
I'll go with that. Let's strive to get the entire job done with (a): (a) Mapping to current RIM architecture as much as possible, and covering "unmappable" items with Slots - and if we cannot do this (off the top of my head I can't see why we could not), then we can consider a limited XML serialization. Joe David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote: > > Joe, > > Combination of a) and b). > > Obviously if you can get the entire job done with a) - great. > > But b) remains and option for those items that the a) > approach comes up short for. > > The nice thing about this is that is leverages the RIM > while minimizing the impact to it. > > Thanks, DW. > ======================================== > Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph" > > > Would that mean (sorry for the multiple choice here): > > (a) Mapping to current RIM architecture as much as possible, and > covering "unmappable" items with Slots, OR > > (b) Mapping to current RIM architecture as much as possible and covering > "unmappable" items with limited XML-serialization (and not Slots), OR > > (c) Something else? > > Joe > <
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]