RE: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts

[Dave Welsh <dmwelsh@microsoft.com>]

Dave,
Of course my simple example was very simple and far from definitive, but
more to highlight that as with CC - BP also will require Registry
services. 

What you mention sounds like an interesting approach to load
classification, although I think there will be more needed within the
registry when I look at some of the team's latest draft work. Also there
may be even more requirements since I've seen some work recently from
Christina Portillo who compared the ebXML RegRep with the UDDI Registry,
and drew some very good additional points industry will need from both
specs - to make them more useful.

As I mentioned, once the BP Catalog team have finished and released
their approved Technical Report, we'll share the requirements with the
Oasis Registry team. 

-Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 3:20 PM
> To: Dave Welsh
> Cc: Chiusano Joseph; Ralph Berwanger; Mike.Doran@cern.ch; Klaus-Dieter
> Naujok; Nenad Ivezic; Nita Sharma -Work (E-mail); OASIS Registry List
> 
> Dave,
> 
> The exact same thing applies.  You create your catalogue
> entries in XML  - then upload them to the registry - under the
> classification scheme of your choice.
> 
> We've already prototyped this - working with Nenad
> and his folks @ NIST and the BP catalogue subteam
> Nita Sharma is heading up - converting the Access
> database records they created
> into a XML structure with the same data in it - then upload
> to registry.
> 
> We've also entered a basic first blush of the classification
> scheme for the EAN catalogue examples.
> 
> Dave - I believe this just strengths the case for documenting
> these XML structures ultimately - as addendums to the Registry
> spec's so that people can re-use these effectively - and it also
> shows how simple and straight forward this process can be -
> using XML in tandem with the Registry to get the results
> required.
> 
> Thanks, DW.
> ========================================================
> Message text written by "Dave Welsh"
> >
> Please also keep in mind that besides core components support we will
> have a need by the registry for the same intrinsic support for the
> actual Business Process models:
> SELECT *
> FROM BusinessProcesses
> WHERE IndustryDomain='Retail', BusinessArea='Identification',
> BusinessArea='Procurement', BusinessProcess='Provide Catalog;
> <
>