Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts

[Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

<Excerpt>
1) Joint registry action team to derive XML serialization for
    core components and develop "how to" guide
     showing how RIM works with this.  Publish addendum
     to registry spec's  - non-normative.
</Excerpt>

Sounds great - what would we mean by "joint" here?

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> I'm working backwards thru the threads here!
> 
> I'd say that it actually looks like these 3 coalesce into 2,
> and that as per Matt's notes and Farrukh comments -
> instead of being a formal sub-team - its more of a
> tutorial / suggested practice addendum - since
> we cannot dictate to all registry users how they
> format and store content.
> 
> 1) Joint registry action team to derive XML serialization for
>     core components and develop "how to" guide
>      showing how RIM works with this.  Publish addendum
>      to registry spec's  - non-normative.
> 
> 2) Context/assembly - OASIS CAM team already
>      building this - and liasing to appropriate teams.
> 
> Thanks, DW.
> ==================================================
> Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph"
> >It appears to me that we could have 3 separate "specs" (using term
> loosely) growing out of the CC spec:
> 
> (1) ebXML Registry Representation of Core Components (and their
> associated entities)
> (2) Context/Assembly
> (3) XML Serialization
> 
> It also seems that (1) would be done within our TC (the CC Review
> subcommittee), but (2) and (3) might be done elsewhere (another TC or
> within another existing TC).
> 
> Does that sound correct?
> 
> - Joe
> <

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano