[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] spec update
I will not be able to attend our regularly scheduled meeting for this week (Sept 2nd) but will have the telecon info open and available if the group would like to meet to discuss the registration procedures feature. For my input, I do have some apprehension regarding getting rid of the RegisterType. I think this is a function that is used/will be used in the future implementations and has value from the customer perspective. Just something to carefully consider... Kathryn Kathryn Breininger Manager, Standards Authoring, Release, & Technical Orders Product Standards Office Boeing Research & Technology The Boeing Company MC 62-LC 425-965-0242 desk 425-512-4281 cell 425-237-4582 fax How are we doing? Please click on the attached link to take the Product Standards Office Customer Satisfaction Survey. PSO Customer Survey -----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:37 AM To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Nikola Stojanovic Subject: Re: [regrep] spec update Dear Colleagues, Nikola, Oliver and I have been focused on the Registration Procedures (regproc) feature set which is the last hurdle before WD6-2 spec bundle is published. I have captured a set of issues and the resolution that Nikola, Oliver and I have agreed to for these issues in the following temporary working document: https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AQjddtUwc3SFZHI5cTJjal83MGZyaHF2c2Y1&hl=en&authkey=CILYiPkD Each issue and proposed resolution has a rationale defining how we arrived at the proposed resolution. One big issue is whether we should get rid of RegisterType and we propose that we do so. Since there is much downstream implications of some of these issues and proposed resolutions I would like you to please speak up right away if you disagree with any proposed resolution. Perhaps we SHOULD meet this week after all with the agenda to simply walk through the regrproc issues in above document and their proposed resolution. Can we therefor plan to meet this week at our usual time to discuss these regproc issues and their proposed resolutions? On 08/29/2010 01:26 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > The WD6-2 spec bundle is unlikely to be available this week contrary > to our stated plans. I suggets we defer our meeting for Sep 2, 2010 > and insteda plan to meet on Sep 16, 2010. We will work to get the > WD6-2 spec bundle out in time for that meeting. Thanks for your > understanding. > > On 08/17/2010 09:34 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> Much progress has been made in closing issues for CD6. We are down to >> two issue: >> >> http://jira.wx.ll.mit.edu/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQu >> ery=project+%3D+REGREPTC+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion >> +%3D+%224.0-cd6%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide >> >> >> Special thanks to Nikola and Oliver for their help on CD6 work items. >> >> Currently Oliver, Nikola and I are actively working on Registration >> Procedures feature as part of resolving >> http://jira.wx.ll.mit.edu/browse/REGREPTC-132. >> I hope that we will resolve these issues and publish WD6-2 (second >> working draft for CD6) hopefully in time for our meeting on September >> 2, 2010. >> >> For this reason I would like to propose that we cancel our meeting >> for August 19th and that we all plan to attend the meeting on >> September 2, 2010. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions on the progress of WD6-2. >> > > -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]